The village of Piddington in England, with a population of about 350, voted to leave Britain in a symbolic referendum. This vote was held in protest against the government's plans to house up to 1,200 male asylum seekers at a military base near the village.
Referendum Results
The results of this non-binding referendum, announced on Wednesday, showed that 285 votes were in favor of separation and 26 votes were against this decision. The local council leader, Tim McNally, said: "We have sent a strong message to the region, the country, and the world." He also announced that the area will henceforth be known as "Principality of Piddington."
Read more: Hashim Thaqi sentenced to 25 years in prison for war crimes
Local Concerns
This vote was held to oppose the government's plan to convert the former Ministry of Defense base at Bicester into housing for male asylum seekers. The government claims that this location "is designed to be largely self-sufficient to have less impact on the local community." However, residents of this village are concerned about safety, crime, and negative impacts on housing prices in this affluent area.
Supporters of this declaration of independence described it as a victory for the power of the people and local democracy. Some media outlets compared this action to the classic 1949 comedy film "Passport to Pimlico," in which a neighborhood in London separates from Britain. Meanwhile, some critics believe that this campaign has stirred fears of new migrants.
Herbert Owen, a 76-year-old resident, said after the vote: "This independence referendum is not just about Piddington, but about everything our grandparents fought for. Today is the war of Britain." The comparison of illegal immigration to an invasion has increasingly become common among politicians and right-wing groups.
Government and Refugee Groups' Reaction
The Labour government led by Andy Burnham has announced that it is making progress in processing asylum applications more quickly. More than 41,000 people made this dangerous journey in 2025, but their numbers have decreased by over 40% this year compared to last year. The government has also committed to moving migrants from hotels and shared homes to more suitable locations.
Refugee groups have emphasized that military barracks are not suitable places for housing asylum seekers and warned that migrants should not be blamed. One policy analyst from the Refugee Council said: "For individuals fleeing war and violence, housing in such inaccessible environments only exacerbates their feelings of insecurity."
Read more: Saudi Arabia calls Houthi attempts to attack Mecca a red line · Markwayne Mullin: 9/11 speech and his criticisms of sanctuary cities
Source: abcnews.com
